A short course on 2D-LC will be offered by Mark Schure and Dwight Stoll at the HPLC2022 conference in San Diego in June. You can see a description of the course here.
"New posts will appear on the home page. See the page links at the top of the page to navigate to the key content at this site. If you see any content here that is inaccurate or incomplete, please let me know (see About for contact information)." ~ Dwight Stoll
Short course on 2D-LC at HPLC 2022
This year Pittcon will offer two short courses on 2D-LC.
The first course (Introduction to two-dimensional liquid chromatography) will be general in scope, taught by Dwight Stoll and Peter Carr, for the full day of Saturday, March 5th.
The second course (Two-dimensional liquid chromatography for pharmaceutical analysis) will be focused on small and large molecule pharmaceutical analysis, taught by Dwight Stoll and Kelly Zhang, for a half-day on Sunday, March 6th.
At Pittcon 2015 there will be three courses offered in the area of two-dimensional chromatography. First, a one-day overview course on two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2D-LC) will be taught by Dr. Dwight Stoll (Gustavus Adolphus College) and Dr. Peter Carr (University of Minnesota). Second, a one-day course focused on the use of 2D-LC in pharmaceutical analysis will be taught by Dr. Dwight Stoll and Dr. Kelly Zhang (Genentech). Finally, a one-day course on the use of tools for the analysis of two-dimensional datasets from 2D-LC and 2D-GC will be taught by Dr. Steve Reichenbach.
A research paper by Gustavus chemistry assistant professor Dwight Stoll, Gustavus students Elliot Larson ('14), Ian Gibbs-Hall ('13), Steve Groskreutz ('12), research associate Dr. Chris Harmes, and several collaborators has appeared in a special issue on the analysis of nutraceuticals in the journalAnalytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. The paper, focused on the analysis of furanocoumarins in vegetables, describes the implementation of a novel approach to selective comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography where the operations of first dimension sampling and second dimension separation are carried out in parallel.
This article describes the use of online LC x LC coupled with mass spectrometric detection for the analysis of anionic, non-ionic, and amphoteric surfactants with with different end groups in a single analysis. A HILIC separation is used in the first dimension followed by a reversed-phases separation in the second dimension. With this combination of phases, separation in the first dimension is based primarily on the degree of ethoxylation, whereas separation in the second dimension is based primarily on surfactant chain length. Modern HPLC components are used and the performance of two different systems composed of different components is compared. The interface between the two separation dimensions is a standard 10-port, 2-position valve.
A new book (Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography: A Practitioner’s Guide) by Wiley on various aspects of the increasingly popular Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography (HILIC) contains a chapter (Chapter 9) focused on theoretical and practical aspects of 2D separations involving the HILIC mode in at least one of the dimensions. This book is currently available for pre-order on Amazon.com, and is supposed to be available in print in February of 2013.
Cacciola, F.; Donato, P.; Giuffrida, D.; Torre, G.; Dugo, P.; Mondello, L. Journal of Chromatography A2012, 1255, 244–251.
This paper is focused on the separation and identification of intact carotenoids in red chili pepper extracts by NP x RP. A micro-bore cyano1D column, dimensions 25 cm x 1.0 mm i.d., 5 μm dp, was paired with a 3 cm x 4.6 mm i.d., 2.7 μm dp superficially porous C18 2D column. The motivation for this work was the application of ultrahigh pressure conditions to the second dimension separation as a means to increase overall analysis peak capacity.
To demonstrate the advantage of UHPLC in the second dimension, a total of three instrumental conditions were evaluated: 1) conventional NP x RP with a modulation time of 1.0 min, 2) NP x UPHLC- RP, with a modulation time of 1.5 min, and 3) NP x UPHLC- RP, modulation time 1.0 min. In the UHPLC separations column length was doubled to 6 cm by serially coupling two 3 cm columns. Each of these instruments was operated with identical 110 min linear 1D gradients providing a 1nc of 45. Overall peak capacity values were calculated for each system, corrected for undersampling, and determined to be 526 for the NP x RP, tm = 1.0 min, and 373 for the NP x RP (UHPLC), tm = 1.5 and 636 for the NP x RP (UHPLC) system with a 1.0 min tm.
Despite the doubling of the 2D column length, with respect to the ‘conventional’ NP x RP set-up, the peak capacity of the 1.5 min modulation time separations were greatly reduced by undersampling. The authors indicate that a lot of work needs to be done to optimize this separation and reduce the detrimental effect of undersampling.
The authors also report this to be the first work incorporating UHPLC conditions in the second dimension and the use of a C18 column with 2.7 μm SPPs.
Gilar, M.; Fridrich, J.; Schure, M. R.; Jaworski, A. Analytical Chemistry2012, 84, 8722–8732.
In this recent paper the metrics used to calculate orthogonality in LC x LC were evaluated using retention data for 194 different peptides. Correlation coefficients, mutual information, box-counting dimensionality, and surface fractional coverage were all applied to determine the orthogonality of the peptide separations. In addition, six simulated data sets were used to determine how applicable each metric was at determining LC x LC orthogonality in other types of highly correlated separations, i.e., bananagrams.
The statistical metrics corresponding to the surface coverage method were found to be the most useful and understandable for the sample sets typically seen in practice. The Gilar, convex hull, and dimensionality box counting surface coverage methods were found to be intuitively easy to understand, but the degree of orthogonality was determined to be highly dependent on the discretization (i.e., binning) of the separation space and susceptible to overestimates due to outliers.
The authors advocate the use of the surface coverage method for determining orthogonality because of its usefulness in calculating the achievable peak capacity of the separation (see equation 2). It is still unclear which of the surface coverage methods correlates best with the overall performance of real separations.
Profs. Peter Carr (University of Minnesota) and Dwight Stoll (Gustavus Adolphus College) will offer a one-day short course on the theory and practice of 2DLC at Pittcon 2013 in Philadelphia. The course is intended for students of all experience levels, and with interests ranging from pharmaceutical to environmental analysis. Click here for more information, or email the instructors (see contact information on About page).
This is a new site dedicated to multi-dimensional separations, with an emphasis on the liquid phase. Stay tuned for content!